
The Human Terrain System embedded civilians primarily in brigade combat teams (Bcts) in Iraq and Afghanistan between 2007 and 2014 to act as a collection and dispersal mechanism for sociocultural comprehension. Set against the backdrop of the program's evolution, the experiences of these social scientists clarifies the U.S. Army's decision to integrate social scientists at the tactical level in conflict. Based on interviews, program documents, material from Freedom of Information Act requests, and secondary sources, this book finds a series of limiting factors inhibiting social science research at the tactical level, common to both Iraq and Afghanistan. Complexity in integrating civilians into the military decisionmaking cycle, creating timely research with a high level of fidelity, and making granular research resonate with brigade staff all contributed to inhibiting the overall effect of the Human Terrain System. Yet, while high operational tempo in contested spaces complicates social science research at the tactical level, the author argues that there is a continued requirement for a residual capability to be maintained by the U.S. Army. Audience: Social and political scientists as well as anthropologists may be interested in this author's analysis as it takes a civilian view of the Human Terrain System within the military combat brigade.This monograph primarily focuses on the violence concepts in Iraq and Afghanistan.Therefore, sociological, political science, and students enrolled in War & Politics classes may be interested in this text for essay research. Keywords: Anthropology; sociology; human terrain system; hts; Hts; political science; Iraq; Afghanistan; military combat; U.S. Pacific Command; Uspacom; violence; improvised explosive device; ied; Ied; explosives; U.S. Army; U.S. Marine Corps; Freedom of Information Act; Surveys; interviews; armed conflict; civilian integration in military operations;
show more...Just click on START button on Telegram Bot